marketnsa.blogg.se

Extrinsic vs intrinsic motivation in sports
Extrinsic vs intrinsic motivation in sports







Consideration of each questionnaire's psychometric strengths/limitations, and conceptualization of motivation in the context of specific research questions should guide researchers in selecting the most appropriate instrument to measure motivation in sport. Bibliometric analyses suggested that the IMI ranks first and the SMS ranks sixth according to the average weighted impact factors of their original publications. Despite some variance in their psychometric properties, conceptualization, structure, and utility, the six questionnaires are psychometrically strong instruments for quantifying motivation that are widely supported in the literature. Bibliometric data were also calculated (average weighted impact factor) and assessed (e.g., citations per year) to evaluate the impact of the use of each questionnaire. The questionnaires were then evaluated and discussed in four sections: Development, Reliability, Correlates, and Summary. Peer-reviewed articles published prior to August 2016 were searched to identify the six most highly cited motivation questionnaires in sport: Sport Motivation Scale (SMS), Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), Situational Motivational Scale (SIMS), Perceptions of Success Questionnaire (POSQ), Behavioural Regulation in Sport Questionnaire (BRSQ), and Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire (TEOSQ). Thus, the purpose of this review was to evaluate the six most highly cited motivation measures in sport.

extrinsic vs intrinsic motivation in sports

As rigorous measurement is essential to understanding this latent construct, a critical appraisal of measurement instruments is needed. Motivation is widely-researched, in both sport psychology and other fields.









Extrinsic vs intrinsic motivation in sports